Skip to main content
Clear writing

Rewrite expert material without flattening the ideas

Have Gemini preserve the original argument and qualifiers, cut jargon and filler, keep claims auditable, and end with the three ideas the reader should remember.

提示词

Rewrite [SOURCE] for [READER]. Preserve the original argument and factual qualifiers. Use plain language, concrete examples, and short paragraphs. Remove repetition and unsupported intensifiers. Flag any claim that needs a source instead of inventing one. End with the three ideas the reader should remember.

替换变量

[SOURCE]

The text to rewrite.

[READER]

Who it is for — sets the reading level.

该用哪个模型

  • Gemini 3.6 FlashRewriting is fast on Flash; upgrade to Pro for technical nuance.

示例输入

  • [SOURCE] = a dense research abstract. [READER] = "a busy product manager".

示例输出

我们只发布来自真实模型运行的示例输出。此模板尚未经过正式测试,因此不显示输出。请用上方的输入自行运行。

为何这一结构有效

  • Preserving qualifiers stops the rewrite from overclaiming.
  • "Flag claims that need a source" prevents invented facts.

常见失败与修复

It changes the meaning.

修复:Add: "Do not add claims not present in the source."

已知局限

  • Always re-read for meaning drift on technical content.

常见问题

Will this make text undetectable as AI?

No. It improves clarity and removes filler, but we make no claim about detector evasion. Focus on whether the writing is accurate and useful.

与 Google 无隶属关系,也未获其背书。Gemini、Nano Banana 和 Veo 是 Google LLC 的商标。