Ask Gemini to compare options on the criteria that matter to you, separate facts from marketing, and end with a recommendation tied to your specific constraints.
提示词
Compare [OPTIONS] for [USE CASE]. Score them on [CRITERIA]. Separate verifiable facts from vendor marketing claims. Show a comparison table, then give one recommendation tied to my constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]. Flag anything you are unsure about.
替换变量
[OPTIONS]Two to four named options.
[CRITERIA]The axes you actually care about.
[CONSTRAINTS]Budget, team size, must-haves.
该用哪个模型
- Gemini 3.1 Pro — Balancing multiple criteria benefits from stronger reasoning.
示例输入
- [OPTIONS] = "Stripe vs Creem". [USE CASE] = "SaaS subscriptions".
示例输出
我们只发布来自真实模型运行的示例输出。此模板尚未经过正式测试，因此不显示输出。请用上方的输入自行运行。
为何这一结构有效
- Naming criteria up front prevents the model from picking flattering ones.
- Splitting facts from marketing exposes claims that need checking.
常见失败与修复
Recommendation ignores your constraints.
修复：Repeat the constraints and ask it to justify against each one.
已知局限
- Vendor details change; verify pricing and limits directly.