Have Gemini preserve the original argument and qualifiers, cut jargon and filler, keep claims auditable, and end with the three ideas the reader should remember.
プロンプト
Rewrite [SOURCE] for [READER]. Preserve the original argument and factual qualifiers. Use plain language, concrete examples, and short paragraphs. Remove repetition and unsupported intensifiers. Flag any claim that needs a source instead of inventing one. End with the three ideas the reader should remember.
変数を置き換える
[SOURCE]The text to rewrite.
[READER]Who it is for — sets the reading level.
どのモデルを使うか
- Gemini 3.6 Flash — Rewriting is fast on Flash; upgrade to Pro for technical nuance.
入力例
- [SOURCE] = a dense research abstract. [READER] = "a busy product manager".
出力例
私たちは実際のモデル実行による出力例のみを公開しています。このテンプレートはまだ正式にテストされていないため、出力は表示されません。上記の入力を使ってご自身で実行してみてください。
この構造が機能する理由
- Preserving qualifiers stops the rewrite from overclaiming.
- "Flag claims that need a source" prevents invented facts.
よくある失敗と修正
It changes the meaning.
修正: Add: "Do not add claims not present in the source."
既知の制限事項
- Always re-read for meaning drift on technical content.
よくある質問
Will this make text undetectable as AI?
No. It improves clarity and removes filler, but we make no claim about detector evasion. Focus on whether the writing is accurate and useful.