Ask Gemini to compare options on the criteria that matter to you, separate facts from marketing, and end with a recommendation tied to your specific constraints.

プロンプト

Compare [OPTIONS] for [USE CASE]. Score them on [CRITERIA]. Separate verifiable facts from vendor marketing claims. Show a comparison table, then give one recommendation tied to my constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]. Flag anything you are unsure about.

変数を置き換える

[OPTIONS]

Two to four named options.

[CRITERIA]

The axes you actually care about.

[CONSTRAINTS]

Budget, team size, must-haves.

どのモデルを使うか

Gemini 3.1 Pro — Balancing multiple criteria benefits from stronger reasoning.

入力例

[OPTIONS] = "Stripe vs Creem". [USE CASE] = "SaaS subscriptions".

出力例

私たちは実際のモデル実行による出力例のみを公開しています。このテンプレートはまだ正式にテストされていないため、出力は表示されません。上記の入力を使ってご自身で実行してみてください。

この構造が機能する理由

Naming criteria up front prevents the model from picking flattering ones.
Splitting facts from marketing exposes claims that need checking.

よくある失敗と修正

Recommendation ignores your constraints.

修正: Repeat the constraints and ask it to justify against each one.

既知の制限事項

Vendor details change; verify pricing and limits directly.