Have Gemini preserve the original argument and qualifiers, cut jargon and filler, keep claims auditable, and end with the three ideas the reader should remember.
Il prompt
Rewrite [SOURCE] for [READER]. Preserve the original argument and factual qualifiers. Use plain language, concrete examples, and short paragraphs. Remove repetition and unsupported intensifiers. Flag any claim that needs a source instead of inventing one. End with the three ideas the reader should remember.
Sostituisci le variabili
[SOURCE]The text to rewrite.
[READER]Who it is for — sets the reading level.
Quale modello usare
- Gemini 3.6 Flash — Rewriting is fast on Flash; upgrade to Pro for technical nuance.
Input di esempio
- [SOURCE] = a dense research abstract. [READER] = "a busy product manager".
Output di esempio
Pubblichiamo output di esempio solo da esecuzioni reali del modello. Questo template non è ancora stato testato formalmente, quindi non viene mostrato alcun output. Eseguilo tu stesso con l'input qui sopra.
Perché questa struttura funziona
- Preserving qualifiers stops the rewrite from overclaiming.
- "Flag claims that need a source" prevents invented facts.
Errori comuni e soluzioni
It changes the meaning.
Soluzione: Add: "Do not add claims not present in the source."
Limiti noti
- Always re-read for meaning drift on technical content.
FAQ
Will this make text undetectable as AI?
No. It improves clarity and removes filler, but we make no claim about detector evasion. Focus on whether the writing is accurate and useful.