Ask Gemini to review a diff for correctness, security, and clarity, rank findings by severity with a concrete failure scenario each, and skip style nits unless they hide a bug.
Il prompt
Review this change for correctness, security, and clarity. For each finding: give a severity (blocker / major / minor), the specific failure scenario, and the smallest fix. Skip pure style nits unless they hide a bug. If the change looks safe, say so plainly. Diff: [DIFF].
Sostituisci le variabili
[DIFF]The diff or the changed files.
Quale modello usare
- Gemini 3.1 Pro — Severity judgement and failure scenarios need careful reasoning.
Input di esempio
- [DIFF] = a pull request touching auth middleware.
Output di esempio
Pubblichiamo output di esempio solo da esecuzioni reali del modello. Questo template non è ancora stato testato formalmente, quindi non viene mostrato alcun output. Eseguilo tu stesso con l'input qui sopra.
Perché questa struttura funziona
- Severity + failure scenario filters out noise and false alarms.
- Permission to say "looks safe" reduces invented problems.
Errori comuni e soluzioni
Every line gets a comment.
Soluzione: Cap it: "Report at most the 5 most important findings."
Limiti noti
- A model review complements, not replaces, human review and tests.