Have Gemini preserve the original argument and qualifiers, cut jargon and filler, keep claims auditable, and end with the three ideas the reader should remember.
Le prompt
Rewrite [SOURCE] for [READER]. Preserve the original argument and factual qualifiers. Use plain language, concrete examples, and short paragraphs. Remove repetition and unsupported intensifiers. Flag any claim that needs a source instead of inventing one. End with the three ideas the reader should remember.
Remplacez les variables
[SOURCE]The text to rewrite.
[READER]Who it is for — sets the reading level.
Quel modèle utiliser
- Gemini 3.6 Flash — Rewriting is fast on Flash; upgrade to Pro for technical nuance.
Exemple d'entrée
- [SOURCE] = a dense research abstract. [READER] = "a busy product manager".
Exemple de sortie
Nous ne publions que des exemples de sorties issus d'exécutions réelles sur un modèle. Ce modèle n'a pas encore été formellement testé, aucune sortie n'est donc affichée. Exécutez-le vous-même avec l'entrée ci-dessus.
Pourquoi cette structure fonctionne
- Preserving qualifiers stops the rewrite from overclaiming.
- "Flag claims that need a source" prevents invented facts.
Échecs courants et correctifs
It changes the meaning.
Correctif : Add: "Do not add claims not present in the source."
Limites connues
- Always re-read for meaning drift on technical content.
FAQ
Will this make text undetectable as AI?
No. It improves clarity and removes filler, but we make no claim about detector evasion. Focus on whether the writing is accurate and useful.