Have Gemini preserve the original argument and qualifiers, cut jargon and filler, keep claims auditable, and end with the three ideas the reader should remember.
El prompt
Rewrite [SOURCE] for [READER]. Preserve the original argument and factual qualifiers. Use plain language, concrete examples, and short paragraphs. Remove repetition and unsupported intensifiers. Flag any claim that needs a source instead of inventing one. End with the three ideas the reader should remember.
Reemplaza las variables
[SOURCE]The text to rewrite.
[READER]Who it is for — sets the reading level.
Qué modelo usar
- Gemini 3.6 Flash — Rewriting is fast on Flash; upgrade to Pro for technical nuance.
Entrada de ejemplo
- [SOURCE] = a dense research abstract. [READER] = "a busy product manager".
Resultado de ejemplo
Solo publicamos resultados de ejemplo de ejecuciones reales del modelo. Esta plantilla aún no se ha probado formalmente, por lo que no se muestra ningún resultado. Ejecútala tú mismo con la entrada de arriba.
Por qué funciona esta estructura
- Preserving qualifiers stops the rewrite from overclaiming.
- "Flag claims that need a source" prevents invented facts.
Fallos comunes y soluciones
It changes the meaning.
Solución: Add: "Do not add claims not present in the source."
Limitaciones conocidas
- Always re-read for meaning drift on technical content.
Preguntas frecuentes
Will this make text undetectable as AI?
No. It improves clarity and removes filler, but we make no claim about detector evasion. Focus on whether the writing is accurate and useful.